Relding Thimnak

Monday 26 September 2016

History of Pentecostalism in India, Focusing on Kerela

Introduction

The prime focus of this paper is to describe a brief history of Pentecostal movement or Pentecostalism in India with special focus on Kerala Christian community in the early 20th century. However, the research will also deal with some of the important works done by the western missionary such as Robert F Cook and George Berg. Since the sources and Pentecostal writing has been less in the library, the research will refer website sources and this paper would mainly focus the history rather than others issue.

1.      Origin of Pentecostalism
The modern Pentecostalism movement was started by a charismatic revival as early as 1901 in Topeka, Kansa. However, April 1906 is generally credited as the beginning date for the modern Pentecostal Movement. On that date at the Azusa Street in Los Angeles, there occurred, an outbreak of speaking in tongues. Charles Fox Parham and William J. Seymour, a white and a black respectively were monumental figures in Pentecostalism around whom the Azusa Street revival evolved. Parham and Seymour developed the doctrine that speaking in tongues was the evidence of the baptism in the Spirit. Most of the scholars credited Charles Fox Parham as the founder of the Pentecostal Movement, the founder of the Bethel Bible College at Topeka in Kansas City. He encouraged his students to discover the biblical teachings on baptism of the Holy Spirit and the exercise of the spiritual gifts. From the Azusa Street revival in Los Angeles, Pentecostalism spread rapidly around the world and began its advance toward becoming a major force in Christendom.[1] Since our focus is India I will left the detail history of Pentecostal movement here, and move forward to the India Pentecostalism.

2.      Pentecostalism Movement in India
According to Gary McGee, the eminent historian of Assemblies of God, Pentecostalism had already established itself in India long before word of Azusa reached the subcontinent. He validated by showing the documentary evidence that Pentecost, with all the associated phenomena, came to Tirunelveli and Travancore (South India) long before the Azusa revival. The powerful revival was witnessed in the second half of the 19th century in the following years first in 1860, second in 1873 and third in 1895. People experienced the outpouring of the Holy Spirit and speaking in tongues in all these revivals though the recipients did not know that they were experiencing Pentecostal power as taught in the book of Acts.[2] Another incident was witnessed in 1906 at Pandita Ramabai’s Mukti Mission in Maharashtra, in which young women baptized by the Spirit had seen visions, fallen into trances and spoken in tongues, began before the Azusa Street revival; there is no indication that this was precipitated by events in Los Angeles. According to various authorities as stated by Roger E. Hedlund, Pentecostalism in India has its roots in Maharashtra at the Ramabai Mukti Mission. The Mukti Mission revival was understood by Ramabai herself to be the means by which the Holy Spirit was creating an independent Indian Christianity. However this does not mean that the Azusa revival had no impact on Indian Pentecostalism.[3]

3.      Short History of Pentecostalism in Kerala
Indigenous Pentecostalism in India first emerged from the Syrian Christian community in the state of Kerala. Its History is very much tied to the history of Christianity in Kerala. Christianity in Kerala claims its origin in AD 52 when the Apostle Thomas arrived and preached the gospel to Jews and the native high caste Bhramins. In addition, there were evidences of migrations of Christians from Syria in the fourth century and the eighth century to Kerala. However, there was an ancient Christian community in Kerala which claimed its ecclesiastical allegiance to the Syrian Orthodox Patriarch in the Middle East. The community, though now divided into two factions, one in allegiance to the Patriarchate in Damascus and one in India continues in the same ecclesiastical and liturgical traditions. [4]
The three stalwarts of native Pentecostalism in Kerala and host of their leaders and laymen came from this community. Pastor K. E. Abraham co-founder and President of Indian Pentecostal Church until 1974 were raised in order to become a Syrian orthodox priest. Another co-founder, Pastor P. M. Samuel, and the first President of Indian Pentecostal Church of God received training to become an Orthodox priest in their seminary.[5] And another founder, Pastor K. C. Cherian, was a teacher in the church-run school and active in the church activities. The Syrian Christian community had recorded instances of revivals since the second half of 19th century. Edwin Orr describes how, as a result of these revivals new groups professing evangelical faith emerged from among the Syrian Christian community. The first was the reformed Syrian church called Mar Thoma Church and then a movement called Viyojitha Prasthanam (literally translated as the Separatist Movement) which can be rendered as the Holiness Movement. One stream of the Holiness movement under the leadership of noted Malayalam poet K. V. Simon ended up in the Christian Brethren and the other led by K. E. Abraham in Pentecostalism later..[6]
K. E. Abraham, a leader in the Holiness movement who had been in alliance with Church of God (Anderson) was baptized in the Holy Spirit in April 20, 1923 in a meeting held by some native believers who believed in the baptism of Holy Spirit and tarried for it. This is a turning point in the history of Syrian Christians in Kerala.  The following years saw a great number of prominent Syrian Christian leaders embracing Pentecostal faith. K. C. Cherian, another school teacher and a former colleague of K.E. Abraham joined the folds of Pentecostals in November 1924. P. T. Chacko became a Pentecostal believer in 1925 while he was a college student. Pastor K. E. Abraham was leading a denomination called Independent Separatist (Holiness) Church since 1918 but was deserted by most of his followers for his doctrinal position on the Holy Spirit. He founded the South India Pentecostal Church of God with the "faithful remnant" of his group who stood with him. In 1924 the Syrian Christian leaders who have been working independent of each other formed what was known as the South India Pentecostal Church of God (SIPCG). This can be considered as the first indigenous Pentecostal denomination in India, now known as the Indian Pentecostal Church of God.[7]

4. Arrival of Western Missionary
Kerala Pentecostalism is one of the powerful spiritual Christian movements that originated, developed and spread in Kerala. Pentecostalism was established in Kerala at the start of the 20th century. Indigenous Pentecostalism in India first emerged from the Syrian Christian community in the state of Kerala.[8] The fact is that the movement of Pentecostalism in Kerala was motivated by the western missionary.

4.1. George Berg and His Mission
The Pentecostal message from the West arrived in Kerala in 1909 through the visit of George Berg. This American missionary of German descent arrived in Bangalore in 1909 and preached in a convention in Kerala. The first Pentecostal congregation was formed through the efforts of Berg in Kerala only in 1911; this was among first generation Christians. Berg was the first missionary to reach out to the natives who did not speak English.[9] Thereby, he is considered as the first Pentecostal missionary from the west in the beginning of 20th century. However, Berg main mission work in Kerela was preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ and spreading the idea of Pentecostal and experience in the Azusa street movement.

4.2. Robert F. Cook and His Mission
In 1913 Pastor Robert F. Cook also came to India as a missionary. He came to Kerala and began his ministry there in 1914. By 1923, Cook had established 36 churches in Kerala, known collectively as the South India Full Gospel Church. Pastor K. E. Abraham, who was associated with Pastor Cook until 1930, was baptized in the Holy Spirit in 1923, an event considered as the foundation for the establishment of the India Pentecostal Church of God.[10] The first task of Cook was to organize the prayer groups. In January 1914, after a four days revival, Cook could baptize sixty three converts at Thuvayoor, resulting the establishment of the Pentecostal church in India. Having an Apostolic ministry, Cook established various churches in Kerala. As the church began to grow in number, Cook established Malankara Full Gospel Church. In 1922 Cook began a home Bible School at his residence at Villakonam Bungalow, Thrikkannamangal. This institution is considered as the first Pentecostal Bible Study centre in South India. Meanwhile, the residence of cook was shifted from Kottarakkara to Kallissery (1924) and subsequently to Mulakuzha (1927), Chenganoor.[11] As a home Bible School the study Centre had been shifted to Kallissery and consecutively to Mulakuzha. Bertha Cook was the first principal of the school. In December 1923, first general convention was held on the banks of river Pumba at Arattupuzha. This convention is considered as the first General Convention of all Pentecostal Churches in India, because at that time all the Pentecostal missionaries and native leaders were united together under the banner of Cook’s independent Pentecostal Organization. In 1926, Cook published the first Pentecostal monthly named, The Full Gospel Preacher, to which Cook served as editor and Rev. K. E Abraham as the sub-editor.[12] Robert Cook was known as the Missionary to Dalits because his main concentration was among the Dalits.

Conclusion
The idea of Pentecostalism could have been found before arrival of western missionary in India that is from the experience of Pandita Ramabai through Mukti Mission in Maharashtra, and also the experience that seen in the movement of Tirunelveli and Travancore in the year 1860, second in 1873 and third in 1895. However, we could mentioned that this movement does not last long in the history of Pentecostalism in India, the root of Pentecostalism in India has only firmed after the arrival of the missionary from Azusa street in the Kansas City of United State. Pentecostal movement is one of the significance title in the history of Christianity in India as well, thereby it is importance for us to know about the history in order understand the Pentecostalism in India.

Work Sites
John, Simon Karingottazhikathu. The Origin And Development Of The Pentecostal Churches Among The     Dalits In Kerala. A Critical Evaluation Of The Missionary Methods Of Robert F. Cook (1913- 1950). South Africa: Submitted in fulfillment of the degree of Master in Theology School of      Religion and Theology, University of KwaZulu –Natal Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, February         2005.
https://www.academia.edu/8731451/The_impacts_of_modern_Pentecostal_or_charismatic_movement_a            mong_the_Dalits_and_the_tribal_in_India Access on September 24, 2016.
http://studymoose.com/pentecostal-movement-its-impact-among-the-dalits-and-tribal-in-india-essay             Access on September 12, 2016.      http://www.revolvy.com/main/index.php?s=Pentecostalism%20in%20Kerala Access on September 25, 2016
http://www.revolvy.com/main/index.php?s=Pentecostalism%20in%20Kerala, Access on September 12,       2016
http://ipc.international/history/ Access on September 24, 2016
http://www.pctii.org/cyberj/cyberj10/paulson.html Access on September 12, 2016.
http://thelordsark.com/india-headquarters.html Access on September 24, 2016.



            

Sunday 25 September 2016

Ka Dawt Mangṭha

Ka lung ṭha lo, ka sia rem lo
kaa nuam bak lo, ka ruah rem lo
ka lung monmaw, ka mit a maw
ka lung aw ṭawn, ka me rem lo
ka ngaihchia pah, kaa ngaichih pah
ka theithiam ko, i hnek ṭha lo
kan hmai lei kong, ka ruah zawn ah
kan si kho lo, ti khi a fiang
kan rak dawt ko, kan rak tlaichan
kan rak ham ko, nain a tu cu
kan si kho lo, ti ka hmuh ah
ka bei a dong, ka lung a dong
kan si kho lo, kan ṭian ṭha ko
kan tuanbia dih, kan nehnang lo
ka philh cang ko, kan philh ve lai
ka ngai thiam ko, kan ti lai lo
kan dawt mangṭha........


Ngahring Dawi

Ngahring kan dawi, tilung kan dum
kan tlaih ngapum, lungkep ngaikuang
kan dap soksol, le buh cak kheuh
kan tlaih chom in, uibawm chung ah
kan sanh hna i, chuncaw meh ah
hnarcheu kan chuan, i kan i hrawm
biasawng tlorh in, biaphawng kan deng
tiva thluangthluan, nih he kheh he 
capo sai in, caan kan hmang hna
a nuam ka ti, Khuptthi rual hawi
lenti hna he, laitlang Zophei
ram i um mi,Thanghor va i
ngahring dawi kha........


Friday 23 September 2016

Joke Collection


1. Salai Zendul Riansok lio Interview .

Hello,Mr Salai Zen..
Q. Hruaitu dirhmun lei he pehtlai in Zeibantuk rian dah na rak ttuan bal?
Ans: Bu pa hnih thum ah cun Admin ka ttuan bal ko.
Q. Nan khua ah ma, nan church ah ma, Political party ah ma?
Ans: Si lo.
Q: Si cun khuazei ah, zeibantuk bu ah?
Ans: Khua mino group facebook, Viber, le whatsup chat groups ah admin ka ttuan bal tibia.

2. Pa Hnawk pa biahalnak..
Q. Pa Hnawk pa Fa pazei zatdah na ngeih ?
Ans: Pa li/4 an si..
1st engineer 
2st MBA
3rd Ph.D
4st nak cu a fir. thief
Q. Ziah pa 4nak a firmi cu na fa chung in na hlawnh ko lo.
Ans: A ze a zei hlonh bia dah na chim amah nihcun pei a kan cawm cu a dang pathum cu rian an ngei lo... palinak pa um hlah sehlaw ei lo kan thi cang lai...........

3. Riansok Interview part 2!!

Mr. Zendul, nan Zung/office na chuahtak i ziah kan kan zung ah rian na rak sok tthan ning si?
Mr.Zen Ans: ka chuahtak bia si lo eh,! Bawtor hna kan Zung/office hmundang ah an tthial le an tthialnak hmun ka thei ti lo hme cu. L0L

 4. Nu Va Biaruah.

NU. Kan pa zeitluk in dah na ka dawt ka chim tuah.
Pa:  kan dawttuk ko kan nu kan dawtnak hi zeihmanh in tah khawh si lo
Nu: Chim ko plz........
Pa, Keimah hi phone sining law nang hi sim card na si, nangmah lo cun ka um kho bak lo
Nu: kailawmh ning cu kan pa, kan dawttuk, kan duhtuk tuk, muahmuah,
Pa: Bawipa kailawm tuk ka nupi nih tuluk phone simcard pathum khumh a ngahmi bantuk ka simi a ka thei lo...

 5. To/
Pachup nu le pa nan fapa a rimchia tuk thiang tein rak kholh uh
pachup pa-- Dear saya, ka fa fapa pachup cu rose pangpar ah ma na rel rak hnim len hlah ca tu rakchim. lol

6. don'r fall in love, fall of Bridge it hurt less

7. Dont break someone's heat, they have only one, break their bones, they have 206.

8. Boy Please give me a kiss babe
Not before mariage dl
boy, don't worry babe, i am already marriage

9. What Exactly is happiness means for u Mr. Herhhuai??
Herhhuai.. Happiness is seeing my ex gf with some one uglier than me.....
How about Sorrowness.
it is when i' m ready to go out but my phone battery remain at 10%...

10. Mr. Zendul PhD Graduation speech 
Ladies and gentlemen, First and foremost, I would like to express my deep gratitute and special thank to Internet, Google, Wikipedia, and web Browser such as Google Chrome, mozila firefox and Oppra Mini also microsoft office, especially i would like to extend my deep and heartfelt gratitute to PDF format and Copy Paste system....THANKQ 


11. Hi Cungpi, I need your expert opinion regarding the relationship between me and my girf friend.
Hey,, dude plz don't ask me for relatlionship advice, I am still single that i promote break up and support Breaking only.

12. Many people are finding  soulmate and bedmate now, But i still can't find even a proper downloader for 
10. Chan Aithlen ning Phun khat..

13. 1990 minung nih thlalang awng kam ih rumro kan duh, thlithiang kan ngah lengah a ceudeuh kan ti kan rak i cuh,,
2015 minung nih Socket kam ih rumro kan duh moble charge pahnak ttha tiah. 

14. Nihin kan chan hi nuva karlak ah dawtnak a leng kho ti lo, kan i duh bak ti in tthit umnak zong tuah hnu ah cheukhat cu nupi le nih hair dryer ka chanta ti lio ah pistol chanh a duh mi an tam tuk cang..

15. Phaisa ka ngeih lo lio i dawr ah ka kal hin thil aadawhmi ka hmuh khun ta aw.

16. Modona cu kum 55 a si ah a tlangval pa cu 22 a si. 
Cubantuk in Tina Turner cu 75 a si ah a tlangval pa cu 40 a si
Cubantuk tthiamtthiam in Jlo cu 42 a si ah a tlangval pa 26 lawng a si
cubantuk tthiam2 than in Mariah Carry cu 44 a si nain, a va pa cu 32
Cucaah DL ka ngeilo tiah lungrawh awk a si lai lo, na dl ding hi  a chuak rih lo i si kho men, ruahchannak ngeih cio ding si Lol

17. Ruahning in thil a kal lo caan, 
Nungak nih bus in khual a tlawn ahcun tlangval pawngah ka tthu te men lai tiah ruah cio a si
cu ve bang Tlangval zong nih nungak pawng tthu ding phun in kan i tim ve
a taktak ahcun Nu ter le pater, motor rit a hmangmi pawngah kan ciah ttheu tawn.

18. Nuu le Paa sinah a dik mi pahnih,
Nuu cu keimah tinak lungput nih a tthen hna nain mi kongceihnak nih a fonh tthan hna
Paa :: nungak ruangah kan i tthen i zu nih a kan fonh tthan.

19. Teacher:: Tell me three tense with examples??
student:; I saw your daughter yesturday (past).
We are in Love now (present).
we will run away tommorow (future).

20. zeitin dah si an block ning pachup.
A status ah Happy CND ka ti 
Nangzong a ka ti
Tlawmpal a rauh hnu ah kan duh tiah ka edit tthan le a ka block ko hme cu

21. A thau mi he komh a tthatnak,
Harnak ton i tlik a hauh tik ah hna a ngam kho tuk, tahchun nak ah uico hna nih seh in a kan dawi caan, vom hna nih dawi caan khin a kan khamhtu cu kan hawi le a thau mi cingcing an si.

22. Nungak aadawh minih vun chat, tlawmpal vun chat ah biadih, biaruah dih lai le sian lo chat awk le hngalh lo khi a fawi loh nan ti cio maw.

23. A caan ahcun Saya te nih period zakhat a kan chimh mi nak in kan hawi le nih Exam khan i minute pakhat a kan chimh mi khi hmual ngei deuh tawn rua ka ti koKa facebook friends pawl hi ka zoh tawn hna i a tar he a no he an chuah kum 1998 tang lawng te an si cang facebook hmang mi ahhin keimah hlah maw tar bik cang tiah kai ruah lengmang ko LOl

24. Ka pi ka pu hi zan khat ah voi zeizat dah a thawh?
Api:: Hawi hna cu na ka hal na hrut ma zendul, zei ruangdah na ka hal?
Zendul:: Zeilo news ah chuah ka duh i si LOl

Democracy Uknak ah Abipi Mi Pathum

Democracy Uknak ah Abipi Mi Pathuam 

Avoi 32nd nak US president, Franklin D. Roosevelt , US president vialte lak ah kum tambik president a ṭuan mi a si, 1933-1945 tiang president a ṭuan, amah nih UN pi rakdirh lio zongah United Nation tiah kan min siseh tiah proposed a rak tuah i nihin nitiang UN kan ti thai, cu Roosevelt nihcun Democracy phunglam a muru hna cu a tanglei pa 4 hi an si a ti.
1. Freedom of Speech
2. Freedom of Belief
3. Freedom from Fear
4. Freedom from Want….

Democracy kan ti tik ah hi pali lawng zong hi si lo i a dang tampi kolai a si nain a hrampi cu ma hi an si ko ee a ti. Hi pa 4 hi basic human right ti zong kan ti khawh.

P. Roosevelt nih pali a a chimmi chung in pa 1nak le 2nak cun keimah nih pakhat ka chuahpi mi freedom of Choice kong tlawmpal in vun thai ka duh.

Freedom of Speech/Zalong te Chimphuan khawhnak

Democracy uknak tangah mizei poah nih zalong tein chim phuannak, ṭialnak nawl a ngei, cucu hohmanh nih kham khawh a si lo i khamding zong a si, lo cozah zong nih a kham kho lo, a si nain mi pakhat nih a nawlngeihnak a hmanhnak, a biachimnak a cattialnak ah rampi nih zulh mi phung le lam he ai kalh, a pawngkam minung a hnorsuan hna ahcun cu a chimtu, a ṭialtu nih dantatnak a inn ve hrimhrim a herh, a chimmi le a ṭialmi kongah ttuanvo a lak hrimhrim lai. Mi pakhat nih zalong tein chimnak nak ka ngei tiah, a au le a khuan i a pawngkam minung hna hnawhnak a pek hna ahcun a nawlngeihnak a hmannak ah midang right a buar caah a palh cikcek a right hman a thiam lo bia a si. cucaah Democracy kan si kan duh kan au kan khuang lai, ka duh poah in mi ka ti lai timi ruahnak cu Democracy he aaralkah taktak mi ruahnak a si. Democracy cu a zeidang khi si lo Sii-kaan, khuasum khuahna tuak tein nun khi a si ko timi a lang.

Freedom of Belief/ Zalong te Biak khawhnak

Biaknak kan timi cu minung pakhat i ruahnak le biakhiahnak ah a hngat mi a si, pumpak duhthimnak ah a ummi a si caah a ho hmanh minu mipa kan hawinu kan pa zumhnak ah thlaknak nawl kan ngei lo, a cozah zong nih mahbiak nak hi bia, khi biaknak khi bia uh tiah tinak nawl a kan ngei lo, a duh mi biaknak, a lungtling mi biaknak poah kha zalong tein zumh/biaknak nawl a ngei. Minu mipa kha ka zumhnak na zum ve hrimhrim lo tiah hnek phung a si lo, a si nain na biaknak kong kha a ngaih huam ahcun a nemnak tein chimhphuannak nawl na ngei. Zeitik hmanh ah Force Conversion tuah phung a si lo. Zei ca tiah Biaknak kan timi cu pumhpak ruahnak le duhmi ah a hngat mi a si.

Freedom of Choice/Zalong tein Duhthim Khawhnak

Duhthim nak nawl kan timi cu zalong tein biaknak nawl he aa khat pah mi a si, mi pakhat nih a duhmi aa thim mi ah i thlaknak nawl kan ngei lo, tahchunnak ah lai pa zong nih vawlei cung hla ah a duhbik mi cu lai hla nak in mirang hla a si kolai, kha duh aa thim mi ahkhan mipi kan i ceih kho lo, a mah nawl ngeihnak tein aathim mi a si, lai miphun kan si ruangah lai hla kan duh dih hrimhrim awk a si tiah mirang hla duh ko zongah lai hla ka uar i ti ter kha fir a si i lih zong a si, ralkap uknak bantuk zong a si caah a dik lo, mipi nih mi pakhat duh aa thim mi kha kan co hlan khawh lo zongah kan cohlan a hau i kan cohlan a herh, kan mah nih kan duhmi aa thim lo a mah duhmi athim timi ruah khawh kha a biapi, mi pakhat nih a duhmi aathim nak ah a hman lo a thimmi a palh ee tiah bia na ceih ahcun cucu nangmah kha ralkap na si, nangmah duhnak in mi nung dih hna seh ti na duh caah a si. cucaah zalong tein duh thim khawhnak kan timi cu pumpak nih ngeih mi a si caah, pumpak duhmi ah nai thlak lo le kai thlak lo a biapi. Cucu freedom of choice a si i ho hmanh nih kan duh kan i thimmi ah an i thlak awk a si lo i an zai awk zong a si lo an duh an i thimmi ah kan zai i kan zum len awk a si ve lo..





Election, Promise and Covenant in the Old Testament

Election, Promise and Covenant in the Old Testament

Introduction
The aim and objective of this research paper is to bring out the ideas of election, promise and covenant in the Old Testament. It will try to explain the biblical meaning of election and the purpose of election of Israel by God in the Old Testament. On the other hand this research will also deal the purpose and reason of the promise and covenant made by God to man in the Old Testament, such as covenant with Noah, Abraham and etc. In this research, however the researcher would be limited in some area, because it was a vast topic that hard to bring out all in detail and insert into few sheet of paper. The first part of this paper will deal the election and in the second part the idea of promise and covenant would be come out.

1. Bible Meaning of Election
The main Old Testament word for Election is the Hebrew verb bahar, which expresses the idea of deliberately selecting someone or something. There are various alternatives for this word: (a) divine choice of Abraham (Neh. 9:7; Gen. 11:31-12:7) which implies his descendants becoming a people; (b) divine choice of Israel (Isa. 41:8; 44:1; Deut.7:7; etc.) which implies the choice of men, king and place of sacrifice; (c) divine choice of someone or inheritance (I Sam.2:28; Psa.47:5; etc. The word bahar, implies a decided preference for the object chosen (Isa.l:29). For clarity, the Hebrew as well as the Greek meanings is given, the cognate adjectives are Hebrew bahir, and Greek eklektos, translated 'elect' or 'chosen'. The New Testament also uses the noun ekloge, 'election'. The Hebrew word yada, 'to know' is used to denote God's election in Genesis 18:19, which expresses God's affection and cognizance of person in love (Amos 3:2;13:5).The Greek proginosko 'foreknow' is similarly used in Rom.8:29 to mean 'foreknow”.[1]

2. Election of Israel
Election of Israel as the chosen people of God is one of the central theme in the bible around which other beliefs evolve. The expression “chosen people” as such occurs rarely in the bible, but its verbal form Bahar occurs 164 times in the Old Testament. The self-understanding of Israel as chosen people of God got intertwined with Israel’s unique history, geography and culture. The whole thinking and life of Israel was thereby governed by the notion of election. Biblical texts expressing Israel’s state of election are numerous (Ex. 19:5; Dt. 7:6; 26:18; Ps. 135; 4; Mal. 3:17). “The lord your God has chosen you to be a people for his own possession, out of all the peoples that are on the face of the earth Dt. 7:6.”
The theme “election,” like any other biblical themes, was not entirely new. Even the theme of God’s universal plan is found in many religions and cultures in the world. What is unique in Israel was the combination of election and universal mission. Israel was no difference from others people of ancient near east, who though themselves as chosen by a deity. Between 21 and 18 B.C Century the Egyptian documents show that their king was considered a chosen and loved by God more than all others were loved by him. However, divine election, among others nations was usually associated their historical origin: foundation of a city, temple or their dynasty. The election of Israel took place at a time of its low existence, while Egypt or Babylonia election took place at a time of prosperity. Yahweh chose Israel in the desert. Israel was not intended by God to stay in the desert permanently; they were chosen to move onward; and the Promised Land was to be held with trust in God. The mobile feature of their life was reflected on the principal religious symbol, the ark of the covenant, which was made up of a box in order to be transported from place to place (Ex. 25:13-14).[2]

2.1.The Election at the Time of the Patriarchs
There are passages in the OT, which represent the divine choice of Israel as made in the time of the Patriarchs and especially of Abraham. There are others which represent it as made in the time of Moses. God chose Abraham and his seed by taking Abraham out of Ur and bringing him to the promised land of Canaan, making there an everlasting covenant with him and his descendants and promising his seed should be a blessing to all the earth (Gen. 11: 31-12:7; 22: 15-17). With Abraham, Yahweh declares the existence of the people, and so he throws the whole weight on the permanence of the race. The verb bahar "elect, choose" is especially frequent in Deuteronomy. There we read, for example "For you are a people holy to the Lord your God; the Lord your God has chosen you out of all the peoples on earth to be his people, his treasured possession" (Deut.7:6). It is also emphasized that the election did not take place because of Israel's greatness or other merits of the people, but only because of God's grace and to express the special relationship of Israel with Yahweh (Deut.14:2; 26: 18).However, to the Israelites they are a chosen people. This idea of election is exemplified in the Exodus event.[3]

2.2.The Election at the Time of Exodus
The Biblical tradition has it that God chose Abraham's seed by redeeming them from slavery in Egypt under Moses, renewing the Abrahamic covenant with an amplified form at Sinai and setting them in the promised land as their national home ( Exod.3: 6-10; Deut.6:21-23; etc.). The passage in Deut. 7: 8 brings the deliverance from Egypt through Moses into relation with the election in Abraham, and declares that it was in loyalty to his oath to the patriarchs that he brought them forth. Rowley rightly defines this relationship by saying that the people was elected "in Abraham" and elected "through Moses". Through Moses the people received their consecration as God's people. The person of Moses plays a part of the first importance in the forming of the elected people, and it is the reality which cements the unity and the faith of the people. It is seen that Moses is only the intermediary but it is the people as a whole that is the beneficiary of election. In the same way, the deliverance from Egypt and the subsequent covenant upon Sinai were probably considered God's act of election. Then, it would be difficult to separate the idea of election from the concept of the covenant.[4]

2.3. The Grounds of Election
The basis for God's choice is frequently unmentioned in the OT; however, those grounds of divine election that are revealed fall into two categories: merited and unmerited election. To designate election as merited means that God's choice was based on some good found in the elected person. Examples of merited election are Noah who "found grace" in God's sight (Gen. 6:8), Phinehas, whose righteous deed in killing Zimri and Cosbi was the ground of his election (Num. 25:11-13), and the Levites, whose steadfast loyalty to the covenant during the golden calf incident, appears to be the grounds of God's choice (Deut. 33:8-10). With regard to the place where Yahweh was to set His name, its merit laid in its serviceability, that is, the centrality of its location.
The clearest examples of unmerited election involve Abraham, Jacob, and Israel. God's revelation that Abraham was an idolater highlights the unmerited nature of his election (Jos. 24:2). God's choice of Jacob prior to his birth excludes all possibility of merit (Gen. 25:23).20 The grounds for God's choice of Israel were, negatively, not because of their numbers (Deut. 7:7) or righteousness/uprightness of heart (Deut. 9:5) and in spite of their smallness (7:7), stubbornness (Deut. 9:6), and rebellion (Deut. 9:7). Positively, God chose Israel because of love for them (Deut. 7:8; 13:5), for their fathers (Deut. 4:37), and because of His oath to the fathers (Deut. 9:5).[5]

2.4.Universal Purpose of Election
There was a universal purpose in God's election of Abraham and of the people of Israel. They were called and brought into existence only because of God's missionary purpose for the blessing of the nations. Indeed, God's commitment to Israel is predicated on his commitment to humanity as a whole.[6] Election sets Israel apart from the nations so that she might in a special way serve God and reveal glory and lordship on earth and in the end bring the whole world to God. Election has no goal in itself, but only the Kingdom of God. It is therefore of great significance that the word election and choice in the Old Testament, whenever it refers to Israel, is always used in the active, never in the passive form: Israel is never called bahur, "chosen”.
Israel is not so much the object of divine election as subject in the service asked for by God on the ground of election. Perhaps one could put it this way: that there is not service through election but rather election because of service. Therefore election is not primarily a privilege but a responsibility.[7] If the responsibility is refused, election can even become the motive for divine punishment: "You only have I known of all the families of the earth, therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities" (Amos 3: 2). It is therefore a misjudgment of the clear declarations of the Old Testament to derive from the election of the nation Israel any national concept, much less any sanction for a "master race" or nationalism.  The election of Israel is a matter of divine Initiative which has as its goal the recognition of God by all nations over the whole world. The way to this goal is the theocracy of Israel; the means is Israel's separation from the other peoples. While the emphasis is laid during the whole history of Israel on her necessity to be separate, this must never be explained as an expression of Old Testament "particularism", but as the adherence to the conditio sine qua non for the maintenance of theocracy in Israel as the forerunner for the lordship of God over the whole world. [8]

3.      Difference between Promise and Covenant
A covenant in general context can be defined as a formal agreement between two or more parties where they agree to do or not to do something and it is a promised that God made to man in religious or biblical context. A promise is an assurance that one will do something or that something will happen. The main difference between a covenant and a promise is that while, in a covenant, both parties have clear obligations and responsibilities, in a promise, this characteristic cannot be observed. Instead, in a promise, what we can observe is the active role undertaken by one party while the other remains passive.[9] However in the biblical usage of covenant means “the promise made by God to man” thereby, most scholars used promise as well as covenant occasionally.

3.1. Promise of God to Abraham    
We can see three things that characterize the promise God made to Abraham:
1.      He promises to make the descendants of Abraham into a great nation. To be the founder of a tribe was the greatest honor of the ancient world. His impact on world history world continue now far beyond his death and his name world be remembered forever by that people. In making this promise, God showed his plan of rising up a new people who world in a special way be his people. Through this nation God was about to fulfill his plan of redemption.
2.      God promise Abraham a new country. The people would need a land in which to live and provide for their physical needs, a land in which a society could develop so as to fulfill the cultural mandate. It would thus demonstrate the way in which God would have man live.[10]
3.      God promise a blessing “I will make you into a great nation and I will bless you. I will make your name great and you will be a blessing (Gen. 12:2)”. Not only are Abraham and his people to be recipient of a blessing but also that blessing will in turn home to all people because of Israel. The promise of God’s blessing provides Israel with the necessary resources to accomplish the purpose of God as his people. This blessing was not given to Israel itself alone, but in order that the blessing of God might reach out all the peoples. In the very heart of God’s selection of this one people the universal concern for all humankind is still central.[11]

3.2.The Biblical Meaning Covenant
The Bible uses just two words for "covenant" that occur 316 times in 295 verses. In the Old Testament (berith) means literally a covenant, alliance, pledge, treaty, league, constitution, and an agreement. In the New Testament (diatheke) means a disposition, arrangement, covenant, testament or will. In fact, the Old and New "Testaments" are really the Old and New "Covenants" - the new covenant being of course that which was established by Christ through His shed blood for the remission of sins Matthew 26:28. The Hebrew word above (berith) derives from a root which means "to cut" and hence a covenant is a "cutting" with reference to the cutting or dividing of animals into two parts and the contracting parties passing between them, in making a covenant Genesis 15. The nature of a biblical covenant is of two types: conditional and unconditional. A conditional covenant is that God makes a promise to man conditioned by “if you will” whereby He then promises to bring about the covenantal promises. An unconditional covenant is a sovereign act of God whereby He fulfills the covenantal promises made with an individual regardless of man’s obedience or disobedience. This type of covenant is characterized by “I will” which declares that God alone will bring about the promises. An unconditional covenant can be defined as a sovereign act of God whereby God unconditionally obligates Himself to bring to pass definite promises, blessings, and conditions for the covenanted people.[12]

3.3. Purpose of Covenant
The purpose of the covenants is to reveal God’s earthly agreements, spiritual promises, earthly redemption, and only hope for mankind. God wants to bind Himself to His people to keep His promises so that He can demonstrate through history His character. All of the biblical covenants contain two types of promises: physical and spiritual. The physical promises are, and will continue to be, fulfilled by and limited to Israel. Nevertheless, some of the spiritual blessings of the covenants will extend to the Gentiles. [13]

4. God Covenant with People in Old Testament
The idea of covenant could be seen from the time of creation in the bible, like God creation of the universe and human being to propagate their race in the earth which we can see in (Gen. 2:18), some scholars call this covenant as edenic covenant. Not only that but also we can found the idea of Adamic covenant in the form of cursed (Gen. 3:17-21). However, whence, we talk about the covenant in the bible, the major issue that are most scholars picking in their writing is started from God covenant with Noah, which called Noahic covenant. Thereby, under the title of God and people covenant, I will be dealing from the Noahic covenant.[14]

4.1.The Noahic Covenant (Genesis 9)
The Noahic Covenant made at Mount Ararat (Gen. 8:4) is a result of God regretting his creation (Gen. 6:6 and 6:13) and sending a flood (Gen. 7:4), and is within the context of His favoring Noah (Gen. 6:8) and relenting of his anger to save Noah and part of his creation through ordering him to build an ark (Gen. 6:14). The flood destroyed many creatures, leaving only the ones saved by Noah. God makes this Covenant between Himself and Noah, and Noah’s offspring (Gen. 9:9) and all the creatures that were saved in the ark (Gen. 9:10). God promises that humans will be master of all the other animals, who shall fear Noah and his descendants, confirming the natural order (Gen. 8:22 and Gen. 9:2). He issues an instruction that no-one should eat food that has life in it (Gen. 9:4) and henceforth allows Man to eat the flesh of every moving thing (Gen. 9:3).[15]

4.2.The Abrahamic Covenant (Gn. 12:2ff)
The Abrahamic Covenant is made between God and Abraham at Mount Moriah (Gen. 22:2). God orders Abram to go to the land that He would show him (Gen. 12:1) and promises that he will make him a great nation (Gen. 12:2). Abraham is also promised to be the father of other nations, for example through Ishmael and Esau (Gen. 17:6 and Gen. 17:20). In addition to these everlasting promises to Israel, God makes specific promises to both Abraham personally, and to the Gentiles. To Abraham is promised that he would be the father to the nations (Gen. 17:16) (fulfilled in the Mosaic Covenant); that he is blessed with righteousness (Gen. 15:6), with land (Gen. 13:14–15, 17; 15:18; 24:34–35) and with wealth, viz. “flocks and herds, silver and gold, male and female slaves, camels and donkeys” (Gen 24:34). God promises that Abraham’s name will be great and that he will personally be blessed (Gen. 12:2) (fulfilled in the Davidic Covenant) and that he shall be the channel for God’s universal blessings to his people (Gen. 12:2) (fulfilled in the New Covenant). Scofield notes that this was fulfilled in “blessings to others through his seed, Israel, who became the instruments of divine revelation; through Abraham as an example of pious faith (Rom. 4:1–22); and pre-eminently through Christ, Abraham’s Seed (Gal. 3:16).”
To the Gentiles it is promised that those who honor Abraham shall be blessed, “I will bless those who bless you” (Gen. 12:3) and those who do not shall be cursed (Gen. 12:3). By affirming that “in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Gen. 12:3) God is foreshadowing the coming of Christ (a descendant of Abraham) and including all who are spiritually linked to Abraham (by those who honor Abraham) and are thus “justified by faith” (Rom. 4:3; Ga. 3:6–9,16,29; cf. Jn. 8:56–58).[16]

4.3. The Mosaic or Sinaitic Covenant (Exo. 19:5)
The Mosaic Covenant is made with Moses on Mount Sinai (Ex 19:20, 24; 16, 31:18) and it is the occasion of God giving Moses the Law. It is worth noting here that this covenant is conditional, as God says “if you obey my voice and keep my covenant” (Ex 19:5). Scofield notes that there are three types of law within the Mosaic Covenant, that is, “the commandments, expressing the righteous will of God (Ex. 20:1–26); the judgments, governing the social life of Israel (Ex. 21:1—24:11); and the ordinances, governing the religious life of Israel (Ex. 24:12—31:18).” In this covenant the tribe of Israel, recently liberated from slavery in Egypt, becomes a “priestly kingdom and a holy nation” (Ex. 19:6), with Moses as its head. As such, it is the fulfillment of the promise to Abraham in the Abrahamic covenant that Israel will become a great nation (Gn. 12:2). The Mosaic covenant, like the Abrahamic covenant, was confirmed in blood (Ex. 24:5-8). In this covenant, unlike the first two, there is now a sacrifice in the form of a sin offering (Ex. 29:36). The sign of the covenant is in the faithful observance of the Sabbath (Lv. 24:8, Dt. 5:15) according to the law, in return for the land and prosperity of the nation. Famously, this covenant is defined with the words: I will be their God. (Ex. 29:45), which has echoes from Leviticus: “I will walk among you, and will be your God, and you shall be my people.[17]

4.4. The Davidic Covenant (2 Samuel. 7:1-16)
This covenant was made with King David, the descendant of Abraham and the second of the Kings of Israel. God favored David and promised him: a great name (2 Sam. 7:9); a great house (2 Sam. 7:11); a great throne (2 Sam. 7:13); for a great kingdom (2 Sam. 7:12), and God further promises to David that “Your house and your kingdom shall be made sure forever before me; your throne shall be established forever.” (2 Sam. 7:1). In this Covenant, the Covenant is with a Kingdom the Kingdom of David and his offspring not with a Nation, Tribe or Family. If the promise is a Kingdom and a future Messiah (Is. 9:6-7), the sign of the Covenant is surely the throne or the temple (house) that will be built by Solomon. We can easily see how this Covenant will be fulfilled in Christ, a descendant of David, and an heir to the house of Solomon.[18]

4.5. The New Covenant
The new covenant is announced as the new covenant by Jeremiah (31:31). The Messiah would be given as a covenant to the Gentiles, a savior for the world (Isa. 42:1-8). He has been especially chosen and prepared by God to bring salvation to the world and restore the earth (Isa. 49:1-8; 61:8-9). The Messianic promise of God’s blessing on the people of Israel is specifically related to the promise to Noah (Isa. 54:1-10; Jer. 31:35-37). The LORD declared to Jeremiah that the covenant with David is as sure as the covenant with Noah! (Jer. 33:19-26). The new covenant is God’s reaffirmation of the sure mercies of David (Isa. 55:3). It includes the promise of the Holy Spirit to God’s people (Isa. 59:21). Ezekiel, too, declared that the new covenant would be established to fulfill the promises of the original covenants (Ezek. 16:60-63). Though He would discipline Israel for her sins, the Lord would eventually bring them back to His covenant (Ezek. 20:36-38). The blessings of the new covenant would be brought in by the Davidic king (Ezek. 34:20-34). [19]

Conclusion
As we have seen in the above several paragraphs, God has always purpose in electing people and making promise and covenant with people that is to accomplish his mission work among the others. This paper realized us that election of Israel does not mean to rejection of others nation, rather Israel people are elected to be service to others nation, so that whole nations of the earth nations may know Yahweh. However, due to space limitation in this research, it is a bit hard to bring out all in detail about the idea of election, promise and covenant in the Old Testament. Thereby, this research paper may bring unsatisfactory conclusion in some part of the issue, but hopeful that it will also give some benefit for other in term of enriching knowledge on the election and covenant theology in the Old Testament.


Bibliography
Blauw, Johannes. Missionary Nature of the Church. Great Britain: Mc Graw-Hill Book      Company, Inc.1962   
Bosch, David J.  Transforming Mission, Paradigm Shifts in Theology of Mission. Bangalore:          Centre for Contemporary Christian, 2006.
Burnett, David G. the Healing of Nations. Africa: The Bible Institute of South Africa, 2003         
Raj, Paul Mohan. Mission, Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. Bangalore: Theological Book Trust,        2009.
Pinto, Fr. Prasad. Bible and Mission in India Today. Bombay: St Paul, 1993.
Work Sites:
Brown, A. Philip. Election in the Old Testament,      http://www.apbrown2.net/web/election.htm#Top of Paper, Access on August 26, 2016.
Padfield, David. Bible Covenants. PDF Format, .     http://www.padfield.com/acrobat/sermons/bible-covenants.pdf Access on September 4, 2016.
S Temjen Imchen, The Election of Israel: A Theological Critique, PDF format,
S, J. Matthew Charlesworth, Researc Paper on: The Covenant in the Old Testament, PDF fomat,             https://www.academia.edu/1574012/The_Covenants_in_the_Old_Testament Access on September 2, 2016.
Grisanti, Michael A. the Davidic Covenant, PDF Format https://www.tms.edu/m/tmsj10p.pdf      Access on September 4, 2016.
Smith, Ralph Allan. Adam, Noah, and the Kingdom: The Covenants of Genesis and Consistent      Eschatology. PDF Format, http://www.berith.org/pdf/Adam_Noah.pdf Access on September 4, 2016.
Wright, Chris. The Old Testament and Christian Mission. PDF format
http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-covenant-and-vs-promise/ Access on       September 2, 2016.
http://www.prca.org/sermons/genesis 8.15-9.17.html#III Access on September 2, 2016